{"id":192,"date":"2011-09-30T04:41:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-30T04:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/?p=192"},"modified":"2021-11-17T11:21:14","modified_gmt":"2021-11-17T11:21:14","slug":"strategies-to-organizing-physical-documents-30-years-later-and-little-progress","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/?p=192","title":{"rendered":"Strategies to organizing physical documents &#8211; 30 years later and little progress"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A few days ago I read <strong>a nice Lifehacker post<\/strong> &#8216;<a href=\"http:\/\/lifehacker.com\/5843845\/how-do-i-organize-my-piles-of-paper-into-something-manageable\">How Do I Organize My Piles of Paper Into Something Manageable?<\/a>&#8216;. I find it interesting to read comments and see how are <strong>other people approaching this problem<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"background-color: #d2d2d2;\"> <span class=\"ctedit\">It&#8217;s only 1 of these categories <br \/>Action and trash  <br \/>Action and archive <br \/>Archive <br \/>Trash <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"ctedit\"> <span style=\"background-color: #e1e1e1;\">It [solution] would have involved a match and the &quot;something<br \/>\nmanageable&quot; would have been a pile of ash.  The management strategy<br \/>\nwould have been to brush the ash into a dustpan and dump the dustpan<br \/>\ninto a trash can.&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"entry-title\" style=\"background-color: #d2d2d2;\">Super Simple <a href=\"http:\/\/www.beato.com\/2009\/10\/super-simple-filing-system\/\">2-Hole Punch Filing System<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"background-color: #d2d2d2;\"><span class=\"ctedit\">a) Get an accordion file with 1 pocket. I use a different file for each year. <br \/>b) File paper docs, bills into it <strong>in the order they are received.<\/strong><br \/>\n Statements, receipts are kept in the order-of-arrival. That is close<br \/>\nenough. Consumable cash receipts are trashed &#8211; never filled. <br \/>c)<br \/>\nBills + receipts for non-trivial items are entered into Quicken (or your<br \/>\n tool of choice).  That&#8217;s the chief organizing database.  There&#8217;s a date<br \/>\n for every record. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"ctedit\"><span style=\"background-color: #d2d2d2;\">Get yourself a Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500.  It makes<br \/>\nshort work of huge stacks of paper (something like 30 pages per minute,<br \/>\nboth sides), and comes with software to OCR it all.&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;m a filer myself. <strong>I file everything in fascicles and folders in a few categories<\/strong> such as &#8216;bank stuff&#8217;, &#8216;insurance stuff&#8217;, &#8216;NHS stuff&#8217;, etc. Call me crazy, but I even filed all receipts from stores and match them to my bank statement. I don&#8217;t do it any more (saving just important receipts for warranties). <strong>The three main features of a filing systems need to be:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>simple<\/strong> (no significant mental effort)<\/li>\n<li><strong>efficient<\/strong> (things need to be found when needed)<\/li>\n<li><strong>no time consuming<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Mine complies with them (after ditching receipts filing ;)). If I can&#8217;t decide whether I&#8217;ll need the document in the future or not, I just file it. There are always opportunities to bin it later, as I take time and clean my archive a few times a year. I decided not to have more than 3 fascicles and I stick to it. Whatever is of lowest priority gets binned.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"ctedit\"><\/span>I was <strong>also surprised at how many people want to go digital<\/strong>. Using software such as Evernote, Quicken, etc. As for myself, I think scanning is not an option. It conflicts with my &#8216;no time consuming&#8217; principle. Maybe I&#8217;ll change my mind in the future. Although I try to go paperless wherever possible (e.g. bank statements).<\/p>\n<p>So!<strong> Did something changed in the past 30 years<\/strong>? <strong>Not really<\/strong>. We only added digital information besides physical. <strong>Is information management any different?<\/strong> Reading again the two well known studies on how people organize their physical information: <strong>NOT REALLY<\/strong>. It looks like digital (r)evolution just avoids (physical) information management :).<\/p>\n<p>Happy reading:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/citeseerx.ist.psu.edu\/viewdoc\/download?doi=10.1.1.135.6808&amp;rep=rep1&amp;type=pdf\">How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems<\/a>, Thomas W. Malone, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 1983<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/lbox.itee.uq.edu.au\/~id\/projects\/mailstacker\/papers\/whittakerHirschberg.pdf\">The character, value, and management of personal paper archives<\/a>, Steve Whittaker and Julia Hirschberg, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 2001<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A few days ago I read a nice Lifehacker post &#8216;How Do I Organize My Piles of Paper Into Something Manageable?&#8216;. I find it interesting to read comments and see how are other people approaching this problem: It&#8217;s only 1 of these categories Action and trash Action and archive Archive Trash It [solution] would have&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=192"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":785,"href":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192\/revisions\/785"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pim.famnit.upr.si\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}