PIM frameworks - Revision history

Mkljun: /* Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng */

2014-01-05T10:40:59Z

Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:40, 5 January 2014
Line 138:		Line 138:
	== Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng ==		== Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng ==

	In regard to a TASK, these ~~sholars~~ define another term Personal Data Dtem (PDI). PDI is a the basic building block for a tasks. PDI is defined as an item which has been cre-ated, accessed or modified by a person and is the result of user interaction <ref name="li">Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng: Towards Task-Organized Desktop Collection. Workshop of the 33rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development of Information Retrieval. 2010</ref>. According to this definition, a file, an email or a folder can all be regarded as PDIs. What the definition also makes explicit is that PDIs only refer to items that the user has interacted with and that have not automatically been generated by software.		In regard to a TASK, these scholars define another term Personal Data Dtem (PDI). PDI is a the basic building block for a tasks. PDI is defined as an item which has been cre-ated, accessed or modified by a person and is the result of user interaction <ref name="li">Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng: Towards Task-Organized Desktop Collection. Workshop of the 33rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development of Information Retrieval. 2010</ref>. According to this definition, a file, an email or a folder can all be regarded as PDIs. What the definition also makes explicit is that PDIs only refer to items that the user has interacted with and that have not automatically been generated by software.

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	<references />		<references />

Mkljun at 14:39, 20 September 2012

2012-09-20T14:39:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 20 September 2012
Line 107:		Line 107:
	[[File:Kljun-pim.png\|thumb\|Figure 4: PIM activities compared]]		[[File:Kljun-pim.png\|thumb\|Figure 4: PIM activities compared]]

	Whittaker uses a variant of Jones' PIM lifecycle framework. A framework for the curation lifecycle, which describes the processes by which we Keep, Manage and Access information, elaborating the relationships between these processes.		Whittaker uses a variant of Jones' PIM lifecycle framework. A framework for the curation lifecycle, which describes the processes by which we Keep, Manage and Access information, elaborating the relationships between these processes.<ref name="whittaker">Steve Whittaker, Personal information management: from information consumption to curation, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2011, Volume 45, Pages 3--62</ref>


	Keeping - Management - Exploitation		Keeping - Management - Exploitation

Mkljun at 14:36, 20 September 2012

2012-09-20T14:36:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 20 September 2012
Line 101:		Line 101:
	* Daily organizing email inbox (moving, filing or deleting items).		* Daily organizing email inbox (moving, filing or deleting items).
	Both tasks include organizing. But first one is about moving piles of papers from a desk to make place for new ones and to support other future PIM activities (in the long run). While the second task is more about supporting present PIM activities (not get overflown with email on a daily bases). Certainly it also supports future PIM but is more focused in the present.		Both tasks include organizing. But first one is about moving piles of papers from a desk to make place for new ones and to support other future PIM activities (in the long run). While the second task is more about supporting present PIM activities (not get overflown with email on a daily bases). Certainly it also supports future PIM but is more focused in the present.


			== Steve Whittaker ==

			[[File:Kljun-pim.png\|thumb\|Figure 4: PIM activities compared]]

			Whittaker uses a variant of Jones' PIM lifecycle framework. A framework for the curation lifecycle, which describes the processes by which we Keep, Manage and Access information, elaborating the relationships between these processes.

			Keeping - Management - Exploitation

			However, he claims that Jones and Teevan (2007)'s main focus is on finding and refinding of public data such as that found on the web, e.g. if people want to repeatedly access a valued web resource. In contrast, in this review we are more concerned with information that people create themselves or that they receive in email. Where we focus on web data it is in the context of users' efforts to integrate such information into their personal information systems. Our more strict definition of personal information means we begin our model with keeping. Keeping is a prerequisite for later stages: people cannot manage or exploit information that they have not kept.

	== Christina M. Finneran: the ''keeping information'' framework ==		== Christina M. Finneran: the ''keeping information'' framework ==

	[[File:Finneran-pim.png\|thumb\|Figure 4: Keeping activities framework]]		[[File:Finneran-pim.png\|thumb\|Figure 5: Keeping activities framework]]

	This framework (Figure 4) has incorporated key concepts from the hoarding literature.<ref name="finneran">Christina M. Finneran, Factors that influence users to leave, acquire, and retain information items: A case study of college students' Personal Information Management, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008</ref> It is the refinement of the "keeping" concept. [[PIM_frameworks#William_Jones_and_James_Teevan\|Keeping activities]] (as defined by Jones) are broken down into the:		This framework (Figure 4) has incorporated key concepts from the hoarding literature.<ref name="finneran">Christina M. Finneran, Factors that influence users to leave, acquire, and retain information items: A case study of college students' Personal Information Management, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008</ref> It is the refinement of the "keeping" concept. [[PIM_frameworks#William_Jones_and_James_Teevan\|Keeping activities]] (as defined by Jones) are broken down into the:

Spamuser: /* Deborah Barreau */

2011-11-17T17:39:55Z

Deborah Barreau

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 17 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Deborah Barreau==		==Deborah Barreau==

	To ~~sunderstand~~ how PIM is performed, [[Deborah Barreau]] tried to dismember it and so divided it in 5 sub- activities:<ref name="barreau">Deborah Barreau, Context as a factor in personal information management systems, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 5/46, 1995</ref>		To understand how PIM is performed, [[Deborah Barreau]] tried to dismember it and so divided it in 5 sub- activities:<ref name="barreau">Deborah Barreau, Context as a factor in personal information management systems, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 5/46, 1995</ref>

	* Acquisition: deciding which information will be included in information space, defining, la- belling and grouping information.		* Acquisition: deciding which information will be included in information space, defining, la- belling and grouping information.

Spamuser at 17:38, 17 November 2011

2011-11-17T17:38:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 17 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Deborah Barreau==		==Deborah Barreau==

	To ~~understand~~ how PIM is performed, [[Deborah Barreau]] tried to dismember it and so divided it in 5 sub- activities:<ref name="barreau">Deborah Barreau, Context as a factor in personal information management systems, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 5/46, 1995</ref>		To sunderstand how PIM is performed, [[Deborah Barreau]] tried to dismember it and so divided it in 5 sub- activities:<ref name="barreau">Deborah Barreau, Context as a factor in personal information management systems, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 5/46, 1995</ref>

	* Acquisition: deciding which information will be included in information space, defining, la- belling and grouping information.		* Acquisition: deciding which information will be included in information space, defining, la- belling and grouping information.

194.80.32.9: /* Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng: Towards Task-Organized Desktop Collection */

2011-05-04T09:03:52Z

Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng: Towards Task-Organized Desktop Collection

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 4 May 2011
Line 124:		Line 124:
	Further reading on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoarding hoarding] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsive_hoarding compulsive hoarding] on Wikipedia.		Further reading on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoarding hoarding] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsive_hoarding compulsive hoarding] on Wikipedia.

	== Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng~~: Towards Task-Organized Desktop Collection~~ ==		== Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng ==

	In regard to a TASK, these sholars define another term Personal Data Dtem (PDI). PDI is a the basic building block for a tasks. PDI is defined as an item which has been cre-ated, accessed or modified by a person and is the result of user interaction <ref name="li">Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng: Towards Task-Organized Desktop Collection. Workshop of the 33rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development of Information Retrieval. 2010</ref>. According to this definition, a file, an email or a folder can all be regarded as PDIs. What the definition also makes explicit is that PDIs only refer to items that the user has interacted with and that have not automatically been generated by software.		In regard to a TASK, these sholars define another term Personal Data Dtem (PDI). PDI is a the basic building block for a tasks. PDI is defined as an item which has been cre-ated, accessed or modified by a person and is the result of user interaction <ref name="li">Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng: Towards Task-Organized Desktop Collection. Workshop of the 33rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development of Information Retrieval. 2010</ref>. According to this definition, a file, an email or a folder can all be regarded as PDIs. What the definition also makes explicit is that PDIs only refer to items that the user has interacted with and that have not automatically been generated by software.

194.80.32.9 at 09:03, 4 May 2011

2011-05-04T09:03:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 4 May 2011
Line 123:		Line 123:

	Further reading on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoarding hoarding] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsive_hoarding compulsive hoarding] on Wikipedia.		Further reading on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoarding hoarding] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsive_hoarding compulsive hoarding] on Wikipedia.

			== Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng: Towards Task-Organized Desktop Collection ==

			In regard to a TASK, these sholars define another term Personal Data Dtem (PDI). PDI is a the basic building block for a tasks. PDI is defined as an item which has been cre-ated, accessed or modified by a person and is the result of user interaction <ref name="li">Yukon Li, David Elsweiler and Xiaofeng Meng: Towards Task-Organized Desktop Collection. Workshop of the 33rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development of Information Retrieval. 2010</ref>. According to this definition, a file, an email or a folder can all be regarded as PDIs. What the definition also makes explicit is that PDIs only refer to items that the user has interacted with and that have not automatically been generated by software.

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	<references />		<references />

Mkljun: /* Matjaž Kljun */

2010-08-29T22:33:58Z

Matjaž Kljun

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, 29 August 2010
Line 66:		Line 66:
	''Main article can be found '''[[PIM Framework - Matjaž Kljun\|here]]'''''		''Main article can be found '''[[PIM Framework - Matjaž Kljun\|here]]'''''

	This framework is based on [[Richard Boardman\|Bordman's]] and it includes four PIM sub-activities: '''acquiring''', '''organizing''', '''maintaining''' and '''retrieving'''. But it does not impose strict borders between PIM activities; rather '''it presumes that PIM activities overlap''' (not only happen interchangeably) as can be seen in Figure 3. <ref name="kljun">Matjaž Kljun, A Study of a Crosstool Information Usage on Personal Computers: how users mentally link information relating to a task but residing in different applications and how importance and type of acquisition affect this, 2009</ref>		This framework is based on [[Richard Boardman\|Bordman's]] and it includes four PIM sub-activities: '''acquiring''', '''organizing''', '''maintaining''' and '''retrieving'''. But it does not impose strict borders between PIM activities; rather '''it presumes that PIM activities overlap''' (not only happen interchangeably) as can be seen in Figure 3. <ref name="kljun">Matjaž Kljun, Alan Dix and Franc Solina. A Study of a Crosstool Information Usage on Personal Computers: how users mentally link information relating to a task but residing in different applications and how importance and type of acquisition affect this. 2009 [http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/33816/1/kljun-crosstool_information_usage_2009.pdf PDF]</ref>

	Its starting point is on '''different acquisition types which influences all other activities'''. It tries to frame for example such issues: an email that is automatically acquired and placed in our inbox which is for example our personal information collection; is deleting this email a keeping activity as we process new email messages and decide which we will keep or discard; or is deleting maintaining as we decide which information stays in the collection.		Its starting point is on '''different acquisition types which influences all other activities'''. It tries to frame for example such issues: an email that is automatically acquired and placed in our inbox which is for example our personal information collection; is deleting this email a keeping activity as we process new email messages and decide which we will keep or discard; or is deleting maintaining as we decide which information stays in the collection.

Mkljun at 22:23, 29 August 2010

2010-08-29T22:23:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 29 August 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	==Pamela Ravasio et. al.==		==Pamela Ravasio et. al.==

	Ravasio et. al. exposed organization as the main aim of PIM. Based on Lansdale's paper they proposed four underlying tasks that users accomplish during organization:		Ravasio et. al. exposed organization as the main aim of PIM <ref name="ravasio">Pamela Ravasio, Sissel Guttormsen Schr and Helmut Krueger. In pursuit of desktop evolution: User problems and practices with modern desktop systems. ACM Trans. Comp.-Hum. Inter. 11(2):156-180, 2004</ref>. Based on Lansdale's paper <ref name="lansdale">Mark Lansdale. 1988. The psychology of personal information management. Applied ergonomics, 19(1:55-66.</ref> they proposed four underlying tasks that users accomplish during organization:

	* information handling		* information handling

Mkljun: /* Pamela Ravasio et. al. */

2010-08-29T22:16:58Z

Pamela Ravasio et. al.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:16, 29 August 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	==Pamela Ravasio et. al.==		==Pamela Ravasio et. al.==

	Ravasio et. al.		Ravasio et. al. exposed organization as the main aim of PIM. Based on Lansdale's paper they proposed four underlying tasks that users accomplish during organization:

			* information handling
			* categorization
			* filing and
			* retrieval

			where ''categorization and filing'' are ''information classification'' and ''retrieval'' is ''information searching''

	==William Jones and James Teevan==		==William Jones and James Teevan==